logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 인천지방법원 2013.08.27 2012고정4913
업무방해
Text

The defendant is not guilty. The summary of the judgment against the defendant shall be published.

Reasons

1. The summary of the facts charged is that the Defendant, as the representative of D, entered into a vehicle lease contract with the victim E Co., Ltd. (representativeF) from February 1, 2012, and transported the tourists gathered to E. On June 29, 2012, G, a person in charge of the allocation of the damaged company, entered into a car lease contract with the victim E. On the ground that G, a person in charge of the dispatch of D’s driver and vehicles, and entered a clean from H, the victim company’s customer, he/she would not assign a traveler between July 2012. On June 30, 2012, the Defendant would not assign a traveler between Korea and Japan. On June 30, 2012, at around 08:00, the Incheon International hotel, etc., instructed D’s tourist bus articles, which were scheduled to transport the passengers of the victimized company until the Defendant instructed the traveler to transport the above bus articles, and eventually, caused the company to transport the damaged passenger by force.

2. Determination

A. According to the evidence duly adopted and examined by this court, D Co., Ltd. (hereinafter “D”) and E Co., Ltd. (hereinafter “E”) entered into a contract with D on February 1, 2012 on a one-year contract basis with its own vehicles and articles attached thereto to transport tourists recruited by E using them. Article 6 of the above contract provides that E shall notify E of the vehicle operation schedule in writing at least seven days prior to the expiration of the period. However, when E’s customer H’s complaint on the operation of the vehicles belonging to D, E did not notify E of the schedule for July 29, 2012, E sent a notice to the effect that on June 29, 2012, the Defendant refused to comply with the obligation of transportation between E and its employees on the day following the end of June 29, 2012. The Defendant sent a notice to the effect that, on June 29, 2012, the Defendant refused to comply with the obligation of transportation between E and its employees.

arrow