1. The remaining designated parties, excluding the portion of the claim for confirmation of ownership and the designated parties C, of the instant lawsuit;

1. Basic facts

A. On February 12, 2008, R Co., Ltd. (1) the process of changing the name of the owner of the instant building permit to the owner of the building is as follows: (a) on February 12, 2008, the building site of this case is as follows: (b) the building site of this case,

3) On the ground, officetels (hereinafter referred to as “instant officetel”)

3) Building permit for construction (hereinafter “instant building permit”)

(1) The construction of the instant officetel (hereinafter referred to as the “instant construction”)

2) After the completion of the construction project, the instant construction project is at the risk of being suspended due to the shortage of construction funds of R Co., Ltd., and the husband of C, who has actually led the instant construction project, shall be able to receive investment from U by the Plaintiff’s husband, and the registration of ownership transfer was completed with respect to the instant building site owned by R Co., Ltd. on November 9, 2009, and the owner of the instant construction permit was transferred on November 18, 2009.

3) However, U, who had insufficient experience in construction works, agreed with T to leave the instant construction work again with T, and accordingly, changed the name of the owner of the instant construction permission to C, the wife of T on January 29, 2010. 4) A while carrying out the instant construction project, T borrowed the construction fund from Nonparty M, the appointed party D. In order to secure the return of the construction fund. On December 12, 2011, M and the selected party D added Nonparty M to the joint owner of the instant construction permit, and as a result, the name of the owner of the instant construction permit was changed to C, D and Nonparty M.

B. 1) The establishment of the instant agreement was almost completed at the time of the completion of the instant construction, which is a right to collateral security on the instant land (hereinafter “Seposty”)

(2) On February 22, 2013, this case’s site was subject to voluntary auction application (Cheongju District Court V and the decision to commence auction was rendered by the said court on February 25, 2013, and on June 17, 2013, the instant site was subject to the instant decision to commence auction.