A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for not more than ten months.

However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for a period of two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Punishment of the crime

1. On October 24, 2013, the Defendant, together with his accomplice B, tried to proceed with the victim D at (ju) E at the site of the Busan Y-gu Construction Project on October 24, 2013.

The creation of an industrial complex shall be carried out by the victim as if he/she has been authorized in connection with the C Creation Corporation and the victim “(State) E” shall be the construction of an industrial complex.

The lower part of the lower part of the 2.7 million square meters was false as follows: (a) the lower part of the 2.7 million square meters contract for construction; and (b) the lower part of the 2.

However, the Defendant and B did not have any authority over the above industrial complex creation work, and (State) E’s industrial complex creation work only plans but did not have any actual progress due to the lack of funds, so even if they were paid from the injured party, they did not have any intent and ability to contract the above back industry construction work from the beginning.

The Defendant received KRW 10 million from the damaged party to the Busan Bank account in G’s name on the same day, and received KRW 20 million from the Agricultural Bank account in the name of the Defendant around October 26, 2013.

Accordingly, the defendant, in collusion with B, was given a total of KRW 30 million by deceiving the victim.

2. On October 2013, the Defendant, along with his accomplice B, tried to proceed with the Victim D at the J (State) court at the I multilateral bank located in the Gangnam-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government, Gangnam-gu around the end of October 2013.

In doing so as to be authorized in relation to the K Corporation, “The representative of the J (State) J is M, and the removal work will be subcontracted to the victim through M, while carrying out any authority in relation to the K Corporation.

First of all, it borrowed expenses and made a false statement.

However, the defendant and B did not have any authority to do the above removal work, and at the time, the defendant only attempted to raise funds to get a contract for the above removal work from (State M) J M, so even if they receive the expense from the injured party.