The punishment of the accused shall be determined by six months of imprisonment.

, however, the above punishment shall be imposed for a period of two years from the date this judgment becomes final.

Punishment of the crime

1. On October 2, 2017, the Defendant interfered with the performance of official duties: (a) at the street in front of C in front of C, Namwon-si on October 2, 2017; (b) at the 1112 report on the Defendant’s assault case; (c) there is a defect in the circumstances where G police boxes affiliated with the same police station F boxes, such as the slope E, who called the Defendant at the scene after receiving a 112 report on the Defendant’s assault case, to restrain the Defendant; and (d) to hear the circumstances of the instant case from the injured party; and (e) the said police officer’s death shall be discarded by

Nice expressed that they should grow up and boomed, and that they would be h.h.,” and assault the G head part of the G in the circumstances with a bad hand.

Accordingly, the defendant interfered with the legitimate execution of duties by police officers on the prevention and suppression of crimes.

2. On October 3, 2017, around 00:05, the Defendant was arrested in the act of interfering with the performance of official duties, and was transferred to the office of the other party police station D police box located in H in the Nam-si, Namwon-si. The Defendant was released from the victim G (the age of 45) and the police officer, who was assigned to the above police box, by causing a disturbance, and the victim G (the age of 45) and the police officer assigned to the above police box, whenever he wanted to sit the Defendant at the right and right of the Defendant, and the Defendant was able to sit at the right and right of the Defendant. As such, the Defendant was released from the victim’s cocons, who was arrested in the act of interference with the performance of official duties at around 00:05.05, and was present at the right side of the Defendant.

As a result, the Defendant interfered with the legitimate performance of duties by police officers regarding the control and suppression of crimes, and at the same time, the Defendant inflicted injury on the victim G, such as the closure of a non-alley in need of approximately three weeks of medical treatment.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. Statement made by the prosecution with regard to G;

1. Statement made by the police to J;

1. G statements;

1. Each report on investigation;

1. Application of each medical certificate and each statute;

1. Article 136 (1) of the Criminal Act (the point of obstructing the performance of official duties) and Article 257 (1) of the Criminal Act concerning facts constituting an offense;

1. Articles 40 and 50 of the Criminal Act of the Commercial Competition;

1. Selection of penalty: