logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 광주지방법원 2013.07.26 2013고정1206
업무방해등
Text

Defendant shall be punished by a fine of two million won.

If the defendant fails to pay the above fine, 50,000 won shall be one day.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

1. On April 8, 2013, at around 23:45, the Defendant and B interfered with the performance of duties: (a) within the E main points in the operation of the Victim D (Inn, 27 years of age) in Gwangju North-gu, Gwangju Northern-gu; (b) the Defendant, while drinking alcohol, caused a dispute between the two parties, she broken off the main disease on the wall; and (c) B interfered with the victim’s heading business by force by avoiding the disturbance of 20 minutes, such as throwing the strawer on the table table, and taking the strawer on the table table.

2. At around 00:05, around April 9, 2013, G (the 46-year-old) and slope H (the 49-year-old age) received a report on the same content as the above paragraph 1, and sent out of the Defendant and B.

However, the above police officers stated that “I am the same, and thereafter I am the same, we see whether I am the same, who she she was wrong, and he am the same. I am the above four people, such as D, the main owner of the above head office, etc., were sexually insulting the victims for about ten minutes.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. Application of each police protocol of statement to D, G and H

1. Article 314 (1) and Article 30 of the Criminal Act and Article 311 of the Criminal Act concerning the facts constituting an offense;

1. Articles 40 and 50 of the Criminal Act of the Commercial Concurrent Crimes;

1. Selection of each alternative fine for punishment;

1. Of concurrent crimes, the former part of Article 37, Articles 38 (1) 2 and 50 of the Criminal Act;

1. It is so decided as per Disposition on the grounds of Articles 70 and 69(2) of the Criminal Act or more;

arrow