A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for six months.

However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for one year from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Punishment of the crime

At around 21:40 on March 12, 2014, the Defendant: (a) was arrested and waiting in the act of assaulting D in the act of committing an act of assaulting D at the C District Office located in Mapo-gu Seoul, Mapo-gu; and (b) deemed that the said B’s cream slope E listens to the circumstances of damage from the said D; and (c) deemed that the above E “Ih, sty franch franch franch franch franch fransh,” and thereby interfered with the police officer’s legitimate performance of duties concerning criminal investigation, etc.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes on police statements made to E and D;

1. Article 136 (1) of the Criminal Act applicable to the crimes;

1. The reason for the sentencing of Article 62(1) of the Criminal Act on the suspended sentence [Scope of Recommendation] The basic area of obstruction of the performance of official duties (f.g., June-1 and April) (f., June-1) (f., the decision of sentence] / The crime of this case is committed by assaulting a police officer in the course of performing official duties while wearing his uniform at a district office. It is not good that the crime of this case

However, the punishment as ordered shall be determined by taking into account all the conditions of sentencing, such as the fact that the defendant has been mistakenly recognized and against the defendant, the fact that there is no criminal record exceeding the fine, the age, character and conduct, the environment of the defendant, the circumstances leading to the crime in this case, and the circumstances after the crime.