logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 의정부지방법원 고양지원 2014.11.13 2014고단1511
농수산물의원산지표시에관한법률위반등
Text

1. Defendant A shall be punished by imprisonment for a year and two months and by a fine of KRW 5,00,000.

The above fine shall not be paid by the defendant.

Reasons

Criminal facts

Defendant

A is a person who establishes and operates a “stock company B” in Yongyang-gu, Soyang-gu, Soyang-gu, Seoul, around November 9, 201 to cultivate and sell mushrooms.

1. Defendant A

A. From August 7, 2013 to August 26, 2013, the Defendant purchased 20 kgs from the company’s factory, “Co., Ltd. E” (Seoul Gangseo-gu F materials), and indicated the origin in the packaging in a plastic box, and attached an eco-friendly certification mark for agricultural chemicals without an eco-friendly certification, and sold 19.5 km (total 325,000 won) to unspecified consumers via G.

Accordingly, the Defendant made a false indication of the origin of agricultural products and at the same time put a certification mark on products that did not receive eco-friendly certification.

B. From January 3, 2013 to September 19, 2013, the Defendant purchased an eco-friendliness 12,660kg or other eco-friendliness 12,884g, which did not obtain eco-friendly certification from the company’s factory, “H farm” (including the location of the Si) or “H farm,” or purchased an originating 22,884g, which is not an anti-competitive pattern, and then indicated the origin in the packaging in mixing with the 200-g plastic boxes, the origin of which is high and eco-friendly, with the 200-g plastic boxes, and attached an eco-friendly pesticide certification mark, which is an eco-friendly certification mark, and attached the 28,245km or 28,245kg (total 346,2858,581 won) to consumers.

Accordingly, the Defendant sold agricultural products with the country of origin labeling mixed with other agricultural products, and sold eco-friendly certified products mixed with non-certified products.

2. The Defendant Company B, a representative, committed the Defendant’s business as described in paragraph (1).

Summary of Evidence

1. The defendant's oral statement;

arrow