1. The defendant is innocent. 2. The summary of this judgment shall be notified publicly.

1. The summary of the facts charged is that the defendant listens to 10 residents of D, E, and name-free families in the Jung-gu Daejeon metropolitan apartment 307, Jung-gu, Daejeon, on August 2013, the defendant: (a) the victim F frequently visited the victim for the purpose of repair of G to repair his house; and (b) the victim F was not in a badial relationship; (c) the defendant was not in a badial relationship; (d) "G, its people, and how he knew," and "F was working for the management office."

At the time of work, it is difficult to get out of her place of business due to the failure of the GV's office, and the first day of the birth.

It is so far as possible to do so.

I am special, written, written or written, in the city.

F. F. Hasheon

B. The phrase “G” refers to the victim’s reputation by openly pointing out false facts as if the victim were in in in in a imperded relationship with G, thereby impairing the victim’s reputation, and immediately talking with the victim’s G about the fact that there was an oil company to be used in the apartment complex with the victim’s G that the victim would not use heavy metals on the oil, and the victim would not be free from using the oil. Although the victim did not receive money from the oil supplier, the victim opposed to “F,” the victim did not have received money from the oil supplier, and thereby, damaged the victim’s reputation by openly pointing out false facts. While recognizing the fact as stated in the facts charged, the Defendant argued that F was in a imperious relationship with G, or that F was given and received money from the oil supplier, the meaning of “F et al.” and “F.” (hereinafter referred to as “F.”) should have been interpreted in accordance with the overall context.