(영문) 대전지방법원 서산지원 2015.01.06 2013고단832

beta

본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.

Text

Reasons

텍스트 조절

글꼴

크기(pt)

굵기

줄 간격

자간(%)

(영문) 대전지방법원 서산지원 2015.01.06 2013고단832

변호사법위반

Text

The defendant shall be innocent.

Reasons

No person, other than an attorney-at-law in a public lawsuit, shall receive or promise to receive money, valuables, entertainment or other benefits, and handle legal affairs, such as preparation of legal documents, in relation to litigation cases, non-contentious cases, litigation cases, adjudication cases or other general legal cases.

The Defendant was a person who was working as a leader of the D fishing village fraternity located in the Si of Si from around 2004 to June 11, 2012.

On September 30, 2010, the Defendant, from the owners of 130 fishing vessels belonging to the above fishing village fraternity, agreed to receive 4% of the compensation from the owners of the above fishing village fraternity in return for the compensation for "fishery damage caused by anchorage, expansion, maintenance and dredging of ocean route" and "fishery damage caused by the construction of loading and unloading facilities and drainage pipes, and the installation of pumps," which are promoted by the Korea Coast Guard, was promoted by the Korea Coast Guard and the Korea Coast Guard. The Defendant performed the business related to the payment of compensation, such as the designation of the damaged fishery service company, the vicarious issuance of documents necessary for the application for compensation, consultation related to the right to compensation, etc. from around that time.

When the Defendant paid a total of KRW 457,398,50 to the owners of 130 fishing vessels belonging to the said fishing village fraternity a total of KRW 826,319,00,00 for the compensation of the Daesan Regional Maritime Affairs and Port Authority and the compensation of the Pyeongyang Port Authority, the Defendant received KRW 240,00 from the Triju river labor union around December 8, 201, and received KRW 32,185,390 in total over 145 times from around that time to July 10, 2012 as indicated in the attached Table of Crimes.

As a result, the defendant was not a lawyer and received money in return for handling legal affairs of other general legal cases.

Judgment

§ 109. Attorney-at-Law

참조조문

-변호사법 제109조

유사 판례

-대전지방법원 2015.12.10 2015노186

-대전지방법원 2015.12.10. 선고 2015노186 판결

-광주지방법원순천지원 2016.12.08 2016가합74

-창원지방법원 통영지원 2013.10.07 2013고단537

-인천지방법원 2015.10.27 2015고단3169