1. Defendant E shall be punished by imprisonment for three years;

Of the facts charged in the instant case, each of the objections against F and G is likely to be raised.

Punishment of the crime

1. Defendant E;

A. A. A. On October 10, 2016, the crime committed against the victim H, I, and J on or around October 10, 2016 - The Defendant, who committed a crime, breadth, interference with duties, and attack, was operated by the victim H in the Seo-gu in Gwangju on October 10, 2016, at L amusement station operated by the victim H on or around October 23:00, the victim I’s knife with the victim I’s knife at one time in his/her hands.

who is a funeral in doing so in any manner; or

The victim H was transferred KRW 15,00,000 on the following day to the effect that the victim H expressed to the effect that he/she would have frightd money, such as sound, and received KRW 15,00,000 on the following day from the victim H who fright to fright money.

In this way, the defendant assaulted the victim I, obstructed the operation of the victim H's entertainment store by force, and received property by harming the victim H.

2) In November 2016, 2016, the Defendant interfered with the duties of patrolmen - around 06:00, the Defendant obstructed the operation of the victim H’s entertainment shop by force, on the ground that the Defendant 20-minutes, such as spiting the cigarette on the floor, spiting, spiting the spiting, and making sound on the floor.

3) Around September 30, 2017: (a) the crime committed on or around September 30, 2017 – interference with business affairs; and (b) the Defendant, at around 00:30 on September 30, 2017, at an entertainment shop for the said L, the Defendant “I” the victim I.

Does it be a salt disease.

In addition, whether a alcoholic beverage is treated as a alcoholic beverage.

In line with this, the victim I was provided with 50,00 won in the market value of 150,000 won and 150,000 won in the middle and back of the house. The victim I was provided with 150,000 won in the market value of 150,000.

In this way, the Defendant, by force, interfered with the operation of the victim H's entertainment store, and received property through the victim I's cooperation.

4) Around October 13, 2017, the Defendant, who committed a crime on or around October 13, 2017 - interference with business affairs, and the Defendant, who did not take the place of alcohol at the above LL amusement shop around October 13, 2017, on the ground that he did not take alcohol, was unsatisfy, and “E is neglected”.

The bit of bit of a bit of a bit of a bit of crimes is different.