1. The plaintiff

A. Defendant Ireland Co., Ltd. shall be located in each store listed in the list 1, 3, and 5 of the annexed stores.

In light of the above facts, the Plaintiff’s lease of each of the instant stores from December 19, 201 to May 21, 2014 was determined as KRW 8,086,660, and the amount equivalent to the rent after the termination of the lease is confirmed to be the same amount. Thus, the amount of unjust enrichment to be returned by the said Defendants is calculated in proportion to the ratio of the size of 1,086,60 won to the size of 112 square meters of the total size of each of the instant stores (the amount indicated as “amount equivalent to the monthly rent” as indicated below), and from May 22, 2014 to May 21, 2014, Defendant A’s delivery rate of KRW 1,068,594, and KRW 1,000,000 from May 22, 2014 to the completion date of each of the pertinent stores, Defendant C&A’s delivery rate of KRW 1,068,94,214,31.

The amount equivalent to monthly rent of the Defendant A’s store size (building size) 14.8 1,068,594, Defendant C& 14, Defendant C& 32.22,324,914, Defendant C& 5’s store 16.31,176,897 x the amount equivalent to monthly rent of each store x the total monthly rent of 8,086,60 x the area of each store (building size) / 112 m2 from May 22, 2014 to May 31, 2014 x the amount equivalent to the periods from May 31, 2014 to the Defendant C& 32.2,324, Defendant C& 5’s store 16.31,374,197 x 1974,397 x 1974,197 x 1974,37146 x 197

4. The Plaintiff filed a claim against Defendant B, despite the termination of the instant contract between the Plaintiff and the Defendant Ireland on May 21, 2014, the Plaintiff continued to sell words, dam, etc. at the 4th shop and used the said store and used the said store. However, from May 22, 2014 to May 22, 2014 against Defendant B, the amount equivalent to the rent for the said store from May 2, 2015 (as seen earlier, March 26, 2015) is equivalent to the rent for the said store.