The defendant's appeal is dismissed.

1. The decision of the court below on the summary of the grounds for appeal (the fine of KRW 3,00,000) is too unreasonable.

2. The circumstances favorable to the Defendant, but the instant crime is driving dump trucks for which the Defendant did not purchase a motor vehicle insurance policy, including the following: (a) the Defendant’s confession of the instant crime; (b) the Defendant is under circumstances that are economically difficult for him as a basic livelihood security recipient; and (c) the Defendant is under navigation of dump trucks with the determination

In full view of various circumstances, such as the background of the accident, negligence, and degree of damage, which led to the victims who were on board the above vehicle due to negligence without securing safety distance, the case is not less severe when viewed in light of the background of the accident, and the degree of damage, the majority of the victims of the crime in this case are the victims of the crime in this case, and the defendant seems not to have been recovered from damage because he did not purchase a mandatory automobile insurance policy, and other circumstances, including the defendant's age, character and behavior, environment, and circumstances after the crime, the sentence imposed by the court below is too unreasonable. Thus, the defendant's above assertion is not acceptable.

3. In conclusion, the defendant's appeal is dismissed in accordance with Article 364 (4) of the Criminal Procedure Act since it is without merit. It is so decided as per Disposition.