beta
Text
Defendant
All appeals filed by A and prosecutor are dismissed.
Reasons
1. Summary of grounds for appeal;
A. Defendant A’s imprisonment (eight months of imprisonment) is excessively unreasonable.
B. The lower court’s sentence against the Defendant B of the public prosecutor (fines 8,000,000) is deemed to be too unhued and unreasonable.
2. Determination
A. The summary of the crime of this case committed the crime of this case by Defendant A, upon receiving a report from Defendant A, her scambling the scam at a restaurant and carrying the scambling of the police officer within the police box, and committing the act of assaulting the police officer, such as taking the scambling of the police officer, taking the scambling of the scambling of the police officer, and walking the scambling of the scam installed at a scam for about five months after the scambling of the scambling. Defendant A, a punishment of Defendant A, arrested Defendant A as a flagrant offender, and scam the scambling of the police officer’s scambling and clothes.
B. As to the Defendant’s assertion, there are favorable circumstances, such as the fact that Defendant A recognized all the crimes of this case and reflected them.
However, the crime of obstruction of performance of official duties, like this case, needs to be punished strictly because the crime of obstruction of official duties is serious and infringed upon legitimate public authority. Defendant A had the past record of punishment 14 times as a crime of violence including the crime of obstruction of official duties, and Defendant A has committed the crime of 2014Kadan806 as stated in the judgment of the court below without being aware of it while being prosecuted for and tried for the crime of 2014Kadan484 as stated in the judgment of the court below. Thus, the circumstances after the crime are extremely poor and the nature of the crime is very heavy.
As a result of applying the sentencing guidelines of the Supreme Court Sentencing, the recommended punishment for the instant crime is between six months and two years, and the court below imposed a relatively minor imprisonment for eight months within the scope of the above recommended punishment, taking full account of the favorable circumstances as seen earlier, and the Defendant’s age, character and conduct, environment, and circumstances leading to the crime.