logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 창원지방법원 2014.11.19 2014노1733
폭력행위등처벌에관한법률위반(집단ㆍ흉기등재물손괴등)등
Text

The defendant's appeal is dismissed.

Reasons

1. The summary of the grounds for appeal (one year of imprisonment and two years of suspended execution) of the lower court is excessively unreasonable.

2. The crime of this case was committed in favor of the victim who resides in the upper floor of the apartment where the defendant was living in the upper floor of the apartment, and the victim's husband was injured by a brue and damaged several times, and the apartment door door of the victim was removed from the police officer after receiving a report, and the police officer went beyond the police officer's chest when drinkingly abused the police officer. Thus, the defendant recognized all of the crime of this case and reflects it, and there is no record of criminal punishment heavier than the suspension of qualification.

However, at night, the Defendant’s act of taking the gate of the apartment in which the victim and his family reside by using the ebbbbbbrance of the above recommendation type is deemed to be in a disadvantageous condition, such as the crime of this case is highly dangerous because of considerable danger, and the crime of obstructing the performance of official duties of this case is light of the legitimate public authority, and thus, it is necessary to punish the crime of this case, and there is no fact that the Defendant did not agree with the victim and the police officer, and there is no fact that the Defendant has recovered from damage. As a result of applying the sentencing guidelines of the Sentencing of the Supreme Court Sentencing Committee, the Defendant sentenced the above recommendation sentence for the crime of obstructing the performance of official duties of this case as a result of the application of the sentencing guidelines of the Sentencing Committee, and the lower court sentenced a minor suspended sentence than the above recommendation type, taking full account of the favorable circumstances as seen above, and there is no change of circumstances that might change the sentence of the lower court.

arrow