A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for six months.

However, the execution of the above sentence shall be suspended for a period of two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Punishment of the crime

On February 28, 2017, at around 301:35, the Defendant: (a) received a report on a drunk bbb, and received a report, and obstructed the police officer’s legitimate performance of duties concerning the duty of dispatch of the report, by assaulting a police officer’s 112 police officer’s flaps by assaulting him/her at his/her left hand. (b) On February 28, 201, the Defendant was demanded to leave and return home from D ( South, 25 years old).

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. Each written statement of D and E;

1. 112 Application of the Acts and subordinate statutes governing the table of reported case settlement;

1. Article 136 (1) of the Criminal Act applicable to the facts constituting an offense;

1. Selection of imprisonment with prison labor chosen;

1. Reasons for the sentencing of Article 62(1)(the following favorable circumstances) of the Act on the Suspension of Execution [the scope of the recommended sentence] The basic area (from June to one year and six months) of Article 1 of the Act on the Suspension of Execution of Official Duties (the prevention of interference with the performance of official duties and the coercion of duties) [no special person subject to sentencing] [the decision subject to a sentence] unfavorable circumstances: The fact that there is no record of punishment subject to a fine due to the same kind of crime: confession, reflectivity, and the fact that there is no record of crime exceeding a fine: The sentence subject to a confession, family relation, and criminal records, etc.; the defendant's age, family relation, and the circumstance of the crime, etc.; the sentence is