A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for not less than eight months.

Punishment of the crime

피고인은 2019. 7. 3. 04:13경 광주 북구 운암동 부근 도로에서부터 광주 북구 B사거리 부근 C센터 부근 도로에 이르기까지 약 3km 구간에서 D 산타페 승용차를 운전하다가 도로가에 차량을 정차하고 잠을 자던 중 112신고를 받고 출동한 광주북부경찰서 E지구대 소속 경위 F 등으로부터 음주감지기로 감지되고, 피고인에게서 상당한 술 냄새가 나고, 횡설수설하고, 얼굴에 홍조를 띄고 눈이 충혈된 상태인 등 술에 취한 상태에서 운전하였다고 인정할 만한 상당한 이유가 있어 약 50분에 걸쳐 음주측정기에 입김을 불어 넣는 방법으로 음주측정을 할 것을 요구받았음에도 피고인은 음주측정기에 입김을 불어 넣는 시늉만 하는 방법으로 이를 회피하여 정당한 사유 없이 경찰공무원의 음주측정요구에 응하지 아니하였다.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. The circumstantial statement of the employee;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes to investigation reports;

1. Relevant legal provisions of the Act and Articles 148-2 (2), 44 (2) of the Road Traffic Act and Articles 148-2 (1) and 44 of the Road Traffic Act may apply to criminal facts, but in view of facts charged and applicable provisions of the Act, it is obvious that a prosecutor has been prosecuted under paragraph (2) of the same Article;

1. The reason for sentencing under Articles 53 and 55(1)3 of the Criminal Act (hereinafter “the reason for sentencing”) was that the Defendant received a summary order of KRW 1.5 million for a drunk driving in 2017. On June 16, 2019, a summary order of KRW 5 million was issued on June 21, 2019, when the Defendant was discovered while driving under the influence of alcohol and received a summary order of KRW 5 million on June 21, 2019. At the time, the blood alcohol concentration level was not lower than 0.160%.

Nevertheless, the nature of the crime is not good, such as not only the defendant was engaged in driving at once, but also the police officer's failure to comply with the request for the measurement of drinking without any justifiable reason.