logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 창원지방법원 2015.09.17 2014나7005
소유권이전등기
Text

1. Revocation of a judgment of the first instance;

2. The Defendants are attached Form 1.3 to the Plaintiff (Appointed Party, hereinafter “Plaintiff”).

Reasons

1. Facts of recognition;

A. The reasoning for this Court’s explanation is that “Plaintiff B, Plaintiff C, and Plaintiff D” is “Appointed B, Appointor C, and Appointor D,” and that, except in the following cases, the reasoning for this Court’s explanation is the same as that for the first instance judgment, and thus, it is acceptable in accordance with the main sentence of Article 420 of the Civil Procedure Act.

B. 1) Part 1 which is written or added by the court of first instance shall add the following details to the fourth fourth page of the court of first instance, following the third fourth page of the court of first instance: “Registration of ownership transfer in the name of M on March 30, 1947”.

“E. The construction year of the above-ground building listed in [Attachment 1] List 1: the main building is 1955 years; the annexed building is 1975 years; the deceased R, the decedent of the Plaintiff, registered as the owner on the building ledger; the Plaintiff completed the registration of ownership preservation on the above-ground building on December 3, 2012. The construction year of the above-ground building listed in Annex 1 List 2 is 1960 years; B purchased the above building from the former owner on September 26, 1992, and completed the registration of ownership transfer on the same date. The construction year of the above-ground building listed in Annex 1 List 2 List 1 was 1955 years; the main building was 1970 years; from around 1970 years; from around 1960 years to around 197, the deceased land owner’s 197 List 2 List of the land located in Annex 2 List 2 List 1 to 197.

arrow