logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 의정부지방법원 2020.01.23 2017가합57516
손해배상(기)
Text

1. The Defendant: 5% per annum from May 3, 2015 to January 23, 2020 to Plaintiff A, as well as the following:

Reasons

1. Facts of recognition;

A. The Defendant is a party and related 1) On December 30, 2013, the Defendant specified the F, G, H, I, and J land (hereinafter referred to as “land number”) from Macheon-si on December 30, 2013.

)Lease (as K is written in the lease contract and it is indicated that the land is excluded, it appears to exclude this land from the category of land owned by the State, because it is a river, the category of which is the category of the State;

And after the lease contract, L and M land were divided from I land.

(2) Plaintiff A is a Nproductive woman, Plaintiff B is the spouse of Plaintiff A, and Plaintiff C is the children of Plaintiff A and B.

B. The Plaintiffs entered into a contract for use and lodging with the Defendant (hereinafter “instant camping site”) and on May 3, 2015, for camping purposes (hereinafter “instant camping site”).

(2) However, while Plaintiff A was drinking for about 20:30, Plaintiff C and booked with Plaintiff C, it was an accident (hereinafter “instant accident”) that caused Plaintiff A to fall off from the road near the instant camping ground to vavadi road, which is heavier than 2m. (hereinafter “instant accident”).

(2) The Plaintiff A was transferred to an O hospital by the 119 rescue team, and was hospitalized in the Central Hospital in the Seoul Central Hospital located in the Central Hospital.

Plaintiff

A was diagnosed on May 4, 2015 at P Hospital No. 5 and No. 6, and was under preserved treatment, and was hospitalized in Seoul National University Hospital on July 9, 2015, and was discharged after being hospitalized in Seoul National University Hospital.

[Reasons for Recognition] Facts without dispute, Gap evidence Nos. 1 through 5, Eul evidence Nos. 7 and 10 (including branch numbers; hereinafter the same shall apply) and the purport of the whole pleadings

2. The assertion and judgment

A. The plaintiffs asserted that the defendant neglected the duty to install and preserve safety facilities, etc. as the operator of the camping site of this case. Accordingly, the plaintiff A caused the accident of falling short of the camping site of this case.

Therefore, the defendant is obliged to protect the plaintiffs in the camping site use and accommodation contract of this case.

arrow