logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 수원지방법원 여주지원 2016.11.23 2016고정16
산업안전보건법위반등
Text

The sentence of punishment against the Defendants shall be suspended separately.

Of the facts charged in the instant case, Defendant A.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

Defendant B Co., Ltd. is a corporation established for the purpose of the manufacture of electronic equipment in E-Commerce of Gyeonggi-do, and a business owner who closed a factory on March 31, 2015 due to business management circumstances.

Defendant

A is the representative director of the defendant B, who is actually responsible for the performance of the duty of safety and health measures to prevent workers from occurring.

1. Defendant A

(a) In cases where a business owner uses electric machinery or apparatus at a gas explosion risk place or at a risk place of powder explosion, he/she shall select and use such machinery or apparatus with explosion-preventive capability suitable for the steam, gas, or powder dust;

Nevertheless, on June 5, 2015, the Defendant handled IPA and a new width in L2 C2 C2 B’s supply room located on the first and fifth floor of the business site of the said B, and used electric machinery and equipment, such as an input center, in which there was an explosion risk, without installing a explosion-preventive facility for such equipment and equipment, and without installing an explosion-preventive facility for the electric machinery and equipment used at an explosion risk place, as shown in the attached list of crimes in the attached Form.

(b) A business owner shall install a warning system or install a alarm system where the relevant substance is likely to be safe from sources of water at a place of business which handles metal, oxygen, and gas-form substances, among hazardous substances subject to control, at least an average of 100 liters a day;

Nevertheless, on June 5, 2015, the Defendant did not install a warning system despite the risk of water leakage in the L2 CFK supply room located on the first floor and the fifth floor in the foregoing place of business, even though there is a possibility of water leakage of the relevant substance. However, the Defendant did not install a warning system even if there is the same risk in the L3 CFK supply room located on the first floor and the fourth floor.

(c) The business owner shall be at the risk of falling down by workers as the end or opening part of the working board and passage.

arrow