The punishment of the accused shall be determined by imprisonment with prison labor for ten months.

Punishment of the crime

On April 21, 2016, the Defendant was sentenced to six months of imprisonment for fraud at the Seoul Northern District Court, and completed the execution of the sentence on June 22, 2016.

[2016 order 3861]

1. On June 29, 2016, the Defendant changed the victim E’s “D” convenience store in cash from KRW 10,000 to KRW 10,00 in cash by means of a card. The inside card is a cash establishment and a credit card must be treated and settled. The inside card is a cash establishment and a credit card must be settled.

“.....”

However, without the intent or ability to pay the price for the goods, the Defendant issued a receipt of cash by taking the cash settlement pressing of the convenience store on behalf of the victim who was familiar with the terminal operation and making the settlement by credit card on behalf of the victim.

The Defendant, as such, obtained 10 primary call arbalestss equivalent to 69,000 won in total, and 10,000 won in cash from the damaged party’s place of such false statement, and acquired 10,000 won in cash.

2. On July 29, 2016, around 04:54, the Defendant changed the victim H to KRW 105,900,00, including the value of goods necessary for cash 9,000, from the “G” convenience store located in the Gangnam-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government, Gangnam-gu, to KRW 9,900,000, a credit card to pay with a credit card. The inside card is a cash settlement and must be set up with a special cash settlement, and a credit card should be set up and a credit card should be settled.

“.....”

However, the Defendant, without the intent or ability to pay the price for the goods, operated the terminal machine on behalf of the victim who was familiar with the terminal operation, and did not issue a cash receipt at will, but did not actually pay the price for the goods by the card.

The Defendant, as such, obtained the issuance of KRW 9,00 in cash, such as hambber, scambling, scambling, scambling, scambling, scambling, and 9,00 in the form of the market price from the damaged person.

3. The Defendant on January 2, 2016