1. The defendant's appeal is dismissed.

2. The costs of appeal shall be borne by the Defendant.

Purport of claim and appeal

1...

1. Basic facts

A. From September 2013 to February 2014, the Plaintiff was a general director of the Guro-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government Council of Residents’ Representatives (hereinafter “instant apartment”). The Defendant is a resident of the instant apartment from September 201 to August 2013, and was a general director of the 8th council of occupants’ representatives of the instant apartment from around September 201 to around August 2013.

B. On October 18, 2013, the council of occupants’ representatives of the instant apartment, through regular meetings, closed the existing apartment website and convert it into the Internet car page, but a resolution was passed to allow the Plaintiff to run the car page. Accordingly, on December 1, 2013, the Internet car page of the instant apartment was established.

C. The defendant Na

In relation to the resolution of paragraph (1), the above Ministry of Land, Infrastructure and Transport filed a civil petition with the Ministry of Land, Infrastructure and Transport, and received a reply from the above Ministry of Land, Infrastructure and Transport to the effect that “Internet Carbook does not fall under the Internet homepage as referred to in Article 56 of the Enforcement Decree of the Housing Act. Since there is no separate provision on the operation of the Internet car page in the Housing Act, it is a matter of self-determination.” Although there was no fact that closing the apartment website and opening the Internet car page violated the Housing Act and subordinate statutes, and having received a reply to the purport that it is invalid or illegal, it is against the Housing Act and subordinate statutes, the act of closing the apartment website and opening the Internet car page is null and void as it constitutes a violation of law. The Plaintiff proposed the above tort. The Plaintiff’s act of repeatedly embling and repeatedly inserting the public fund of this case by making it a false name of the apartment page in the instant case.”

The defendant is above C.

The purpose of this paragraph is to slander the act of this subsection.