A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for not more than six months and a fine not exceeding 400,000 won.

When the defendant does not pay the above fine.

Punishment of the crime

On August 31, 2017, the Defendant was sentenced to three months of imprisonment for a crime of damage to public goods at the Seoul Eastern District Court on August 31, 2017, and on October 8, 2017, after the detention was revoked at the Seoul Eastern District Court’s detention center on October 8, 2017, the Defendant terminated the enforcement of the sentence.

1. On May 3, 2018, the Defendant was sentenced to six months of imprisonment by the Seoul Eastern District Court due to interference with the performance of official duties, etc., and was released on July 2, 2018 by the Seoul Eastern District Court, and was released on July 2, 2018.

On July 2, 2018, the Defendant, at around 07:10 on July 2, 2018, was released, against the victim D (28 taxes) who was frighted in Seongbuk-gu Seoul, Seongbuk-gu, Seoul, the Defendant, without any reason under the influence of alcohol, dumpeded the victim’s fat, and dumped the victim’s face, etc., so that the victim’s face can be taken, and the Defendant suffered an injury on the number of days of treatment.

2. The Defendant damaged public goods, upon receiving a report of 112 by an act of violence as described in paragraph 1, arrested a flagrant offender from E District Assistant F of Seoul District Police Station E District F, thereby getting off the patrol car No. 34.

이후 피고인은 술에 취한 상태로 순찰 차 뒷좌석에 앉아 순찰차의 가림 막을 “ 쾅, 쾅” 소리가 나도록 주먹과 발로 수회 걷어 차, 가림 막에 흠집이 나고, 가림 막의 고정된 부분이 떨어져 나가도록 만드는 등 공무소에서 사용하는 물건을 손상하였다.

3. The Defendant continued to violate the Punishment of Minor Offenses Act, as described in paragraph 2, arrested a flagrant offender at the E District Group of Seoul Cancer Police Station, and expressed, under the influence of alcohol, the police officers who were working in the influence of alcohol, expressed desire to do so at a large interest, such as “Chewing singing to this conclusion of the judgment,” and collected the broadcasts in their possession to police officers, etc., and committed the act of disturbing the revocation of the disposition within the E District, which is a government office.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. A protocol concerning the examination of suspects of D;

1. The police statement protocol with respect to F and G 1.