logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 인천지방법원 2017.02.02 2016나9520
물품대금
Text

1. Of the judgment of the court of first instance, the part against the plaintiff corresponding to the money ordered to pay below shall be revoked.

The defendant.

Reasons

1. As to the cause of claim

A. The party’s assertion 1) subcontracted the manufacture of a fire door to the Plaintiff, and supplied 350 hinges (red to 25,000 won per piece) necessary for it, and the contract was rescinded. If so, the Defendant is obliged to return 350 hings to the Plaintiff on several occasions, and the Defendant is also obligated to pay 8,750,000 won, which is its value, to the Plaintiff. 2) The Plaintiff is not a Plaintiff who is not a stock company but a beneficiary company, and thus, it cannot compensate the Plaintiff for damages.

B. 1) On May 14, 2015, the Plaintiff produced and supplied a door necessary for the Hanam Complex Construction Corporation’s construction to the New World Construction. The Defendant manufactured and supplied a fire door to the Plaintiff to the Plaintiff (hereinafter “instant contract”). The New World Construction Co., Ltd. (hereinafter “instant contract”). The new World Construction Co., Ltd. (hereinafter “instant contract”) provided a beneficiary-beneficiary Co., Ltd. with a door door for manufacturing.

The New World Construction Co., Ltd. requested the Plaintiff to deliver a thing sot to the Defendant. On June 15, 2015, 350 U.S. Co., Ltd supplied the Defendant with a thing 350 (25,000 won per single unit).

3) The Defendant completed the press part of the door door and supplied it to the Plaintiff. The Plaintiff and the Defendant agreed on the instant contract around December 2015, and the Defendant rescinded the agreement. 4) The Plaintiff did not use it for the production up to the time when the beneficiary-based company was delivered by the beneficiary-based company. On February 18, 2016, the Plaintiff notified the Defendant that he would return the destination to the Defendant and claim compensation for damages equivalent to the value without return.

However, the defendant does not return it on the ground that he lost the hump.

[Ground of recognition] Facts without dispute, entry of Gap evidence 1 to 6, purport of the whole pleadings

C. Determination 1 Company.

arrow