Defendant

A Imprisonment with prison labor for one year, for 10 months, for 10 months, for 10 months, for 8 months, for 10 months.

(b).

Punishment of the crime

[Presumption Facts] Defendant A is a person who operates a door manufacturer in the trade name of “L” in Kimpo-si, Kimpo-si, and Defendant B is a person who operates a door manufacturer in the trade name of “N” in Jinju-si, and Defendant C is a person who operates a door manufacturer in the trade name of “P” in the name of “P” in the name of “P” in the name of “P” in the name of “P,” and Defendant D is a person who operates a door manufacturer in the trade name of “R,” in the name of “R,” in the name of “R,” in the name of “

The victims' living environment testing institute in Korea is a national officially certified testing institution which has its main source in 199, added to Geumcheon-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government, and is in charge of conducting tests on the fire-prevention performance, heating performance, etc. of Class A fire doors and issuing the test results.

In accordance with the relevant Acts and subordinate statutes, a building with a major structure added to fireproof structure or non-incombustible material, the total floor area exceeds 1,00 square meters shall be partitioned by floors, walls, and Class A doors of fireproof structure, and the above Class A fire doors shall be recognized as fire-prevention performance, such as rain heat, dys, etc. in accordance with the “Standards for Automatic Fire Engines and Fire Door” as determined and publicly announced by the Minister of Construction and Transportation.

In addition, if one applicant intends to obtain the confirmation of the fire prevention performance of the above fire prevention, he/she shall apply for the performance test to the testing institution in accordance with the above notification, and the applicant shall be the manufacturer and manufacturer of the performance verification product, and shall submit data such as drawings verifying the performance verification.

Defendant

B, Defendant C, and Defendant D have no capacity to produce fire doors that meet the above notification criteria, and were unable to recognize the performance of fire prevention from the injured party. As such, Defendant C issued money to Defendant A and the fire doors produced by Defendant A are the same as they were produced, and they planned to be issued a fire prevention performance test report from the injured party.

[Criminal facts]

1. Defendant A, Defendant A.