A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for not less than eight months.

However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Punishment of the crime

On January 25, 2016, at around 21:40, the Defendant brought a dispute with the victim D (the 45 years of age) at the C office located in Masung City B, and brought an injury to the victim, such as the cage of the cage at which approximately four weeks of treatment is needed, by taking the victim's head into his arms, after taking the victim's head into his arms, and taking the victim's head into his arms into his arms.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. A protocol concerning the examination of suspects of D;

1. Each police statement made to E and F;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes to field photographs, diagnostic reports, and photographs of the scene of violence;

1. Article 257 (1) of the Criminal Act applicable to the facts constituting the crime, and Article 257 of the Criminal Act, and the choice of imprisonment;

1. Article 62 (1) of the Criminal Act on the suspended execution;

1. In the case where the reason for sentencing of Article 62-2 of the Social Service Order and the reason for the protection and observation of protection [the scope of recommendation] general injury [the scope of recommendation] [the person subject to special mitigation] [the person subject to special mitigation] punishment not to grant punishment (including efforts to recover damage), or considerable damage has been restored [the decision of sentence] the crime of this case committed by the defendant with an alley that requires four-day medical treatment by assaulting another person while being punished several times due to violence while the defendant did not participate in the crime of violence and assaulting another person, the nature of the crime of the crime of this case committed by assaulting another person shall be bad, and the defendant received a letter by mutual agreement. It is so decided as per Disposition, taking into account all the reasons for sentencing, such as the fact that the defendant recovered the damage to the victim and received a letter by mutual agreement.