1. The Defendant received KRW 250,000,000 from the Plaintiff, and simultaneously with the Plaintiff’s real estate stated in the attached list.

1. On May 14, 2017, the fact that the Plaintiff leased the real estate indicated in the attached list to the Defendant as specified in the lease term from May 20, 2017 to June 30, 2019, the lease deposit amount of KRW 250,000 is set as KRW 250,000 does not conflict between the parties.

Therefore, since the above lease contract has terminated upon the expiration of the term, the defendant is obligated to deliver the real estate stated in the attached Table to the plaintiff at the same time as receiving KRW 250,000 from the plaintiff, except in extenuating circumstances.

2. The defendant asserts that the lease contract is implicitly renewed, but there is no evidence to acknowledge it.

3. Therefore, the plaintiff's claim of this case is justified within the scope of seeking simultaneous performance with the lease deposit, and it is so decided as per Disposition.