All judgment of the court below shall be reversed.

Defendant

A Imprisonment with prison labor for a maximum of one year and six months, for a short of one year and two months, and for a defendant B.

1. The decision of the court below on the gist of the grounds of appeal (for defendant A: the maximum of 10 months of imprisonment, the short of 8 months of imprisonment, and the defendant B: 10 months of imprisonment, and for the second time of the decision of the court below, the defendant A: the maximum of 8 months of imprisonment, the short of 6 months, and the defendant B and H: each of 8 months of imprisonment) is too unreasonable.

2. Prior to the judgment on the grounds for appeal as to Defendant A and B, the court below rendered ex officio the judgment on the grounds for appeal as to Defendant A and B, and the court below rendered a separate examination as to Defendant A and B with the heading 2659, 3653, 2018, 49, 2018, 200, 3654, 2000, 2000, 10,000,0000,0000,0000,00000,0000,0000,0000,0000,0000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,00,00,00,00.

3. The defendant committed each of the crimes of this case again while he was tried for another crime, and was a middle student at the time of the appeal by the defendant BH

D Considering that the nature of the crime was not good in light of the criminal law, such as having the criminal conduct of theft and dividing the proceeds with other accomplices, it is necessary to punish the defendant with an erroneous charge.

However, the defendant still seems to have an attitude against the defendant's age, and there is no history of punishment for the same kind of crime, the balance with the case of a judgment simultaneously with a special larceny that has become final and conclusive, and the victim BW, BX, BY, and B have agreed to compensate for damages in the trial.