logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울중앙지방법원 2015.12.17 2015고단6682
경범죄처벌법위반등
Text

A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment with prison labor for not more than four months and a fine not exceeding three hundred thousand won.

If the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

1. On September 20, 2015, the Defendant violated the Punishment of Minor Offenses Act in collusion with C (the same day) and, on September 20, 2015, in collusion with C (the same day), made a false report call to the effect that “The Defendant and the obligor against C, who is the obligor against the said Defendant, contacts the Defendant with a cell phone to take money or to receive money, but does not contact with the Defendant, but did not contact with the Defendant.” The Defendant made a false report call at 119 to the effect that “The person was dead at the house, which would cause the death of the person on the house, to open and confirm the door,” and sent out the Seoul Shiro Fire Station and six others and two other police boxes of the Hydae-gu Police Station, both of which were sent.

Accordingly, the Defendant conspiredd with the above C to report a false accident to a public official.

2. On September 20, 2015, the Defendant: (a) around 10:54, at the investigation office and the Economic Team office of Jongno-gu Seoul, Jongno-gu, Seoul Gyeongcheon-gu (112-16), and (b) upon receipt of a false report to a public official in violation of the Punishment of Minor Offenses Act, the Defendant stated the Defendant’s name, resident registration number, etc. in the Defendant’s personal record column without authority to ask questions about personal information from the police officer I; and (b) stated the Defendant’s name, resident registration number, etc. in the Defendant’s criminal record column; and (c) stated the Defendant’s signature in the statement column of the suspect interrogation protocol at the end of the suspect interrogation protocol; and (d) forged the signature of the said J in a manner subsequent to the statement column; and (e) submitted a forged suspect’s signature to I who knew of such forgery at the seat, and exercised it.

Accordingly, the defendant forged another person's signature for the purpose of exercising the right, and exercised the forged other person's signature.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. C or each protocol of suspect examination of the police against the accused;

1. Application of the Acts and subordinate statutes for investigation reporting;

1. Article 329(2) and Article 329(1) of the Criminal Act (a) of the Act on the Punishment, etc. of Minor Offenses (a private signature, forgery, and the use of a false investigation or signature), and Article 3(3) of the Punishment, etc

arrow