A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for six months.

However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for a period of two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Punishment of the crime

On January 2010, the Defendant accepted the proposal that “if any real estate is owned, the Defendant would obtain a loan from a financial institution and take the loan from the financial institution by taking out a false lease contract,” which was entered into a part of the name in which he was aware of and became aware of the contact with the arbial advertising inserted on the “intersection” in the living information site.

Around that time, the Defendant conspired with C as a person with a false right to lease on a deposit basis who was introduced by a person with no name or a person with a false name or a false right to lease on a deposit basis, by taking advantage of the fact that 101 of the Da building 101 of Ansan-si, Ansan-si, was one of his own children E, the Defendant, as if the Defendant entered into a lease contract with C with the above 101, attempted

On February 5, 2010, the Defendant submitted all documents necessary for filing an application for loan of the lease of the real estate with the effect that “E leases KRW 75 million from February 6, 2010 to February 5, 2012, to C” at the point south of the Republic of Korea in Ansan-si, Ansan-si, the Defendant submitted to the employees of the victim bank of the Republic of Korea, who works for the said branch, all documents necessary for filing an application for loan of the lease of the lease of the lease of the real estate lease of KRW 75 million from February 6, 2010 to February 5, 2012.

However, the defendant did not have the intention or ability to establish the right to lease on a deposit basis as set forth in the above 101 and did not have the intention or ability to repay the money even if he received money from the injured party as a gold-generation.

Nevertheless, the Defendant, in collusion with the Defendant, by deceiving the victim as above, and was transferred to a new bank account (Account Number:F) in the name of E under the pretext of the withdrawal from the previous household from the victim, by deceiving him/her.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. Each protocol concerning the examination of the police officers in relation to E, C, and G;

1. Inquiry into the details of liquidity transactions, certificates of all registered matters (including horse claims) - Condominium, .