beta
Text
A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for not more than ten months.
Reasons
Punishment of the crime
【Criminal Records of Crimes】 On November 17, 2016, the Defendant was sentenced to imprisonment with prison labor for a violation of the Electronic Financial Transactions Act at the Seo-gu District Court’s Branch Branch, and the sentence was finalized on the 25th day of the same month.
【Criminal facts related to the Defendant, along with C, D, and E on June 2013, at the office of “G” located in Daegu-gu, Daegu-gu, Seoul-gu, sought a loan against security under the name of E from a financial institution despite the fact that E concluded a lease contract with respect to “J apartment Nos. 102, 1103, an I-owned apartment located in the Daegu-gu, Daegu-gu, Daegu-gu, and that E did not intend to reside, and that E would have concluded a lease contract.
The Defendant, together with C, managed the process of receiving the lease and loan, and established G as the representative director, and issued a certificate of employment as if he was an employee of the above company, and entered into a sales contract with B, stating D around June 28, 2013 as the purchaser of the above apartment, to purchase the above apartment amounting to KRW 127,500,000,00,000,000,000.
7. 17. Around 17. He prepared a real estate lease agreement with E as a lessee and I as a lessor with the lease deposit amounting to KRW 95 million.
In addition, on July 23, 2013, the Defendant, along with C and E, prepared an application for the withdrawal of a pre-household with loans of KRW 68 million in the trade name in Seo-gu, Seo-gu, Daegu, Seo-gu, Seo-gu, and attached a contract for the establishment of a neighboring pledge, acceptance of the establishment of a pledge right and a written promise for the return of a lease deposit, and submitted it to the victim through the employee of the victim Hyundai Capital Co., Ltd., along with the above employment certificate.
However, in fact, the defendant did not think that the above apartment house should be leased in the name of E and reside, and it was thought that the loan was obtained from the damaged party with the false lease contract by acquiring the loan from the third party, and there was no special property or income, so the above loan is extended from the damaged party.