logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 울산지방법원 2018.06.05 2018고단767
도로교통법위반(음주측정거부)
Text

Defendant shall be punished by a fine of KRW 7,000,000.

When the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100,000 won.

Reasons

Criminal facts

On March 12, 2018, the Defendant: (a) while driving a motor vehicle in front of the D Center located in Ulsan-gun, Ulsan-gun, Ulsan-gun, with drinking alcohol on the road; (b) while driving a motor vehicle in front of the D Center, the Defendant was frighting the center line while driving a motor vehicle while driving a motor vehicle in front of the D Center.

The front part of the F Driving G Rad vehicle was the traffic accident that took the front part of the vehicle in front of the above Rad vehicle.

On March 12, 2018, at around 20:07, the Defendant driven a motor vehicle under the influence of alcohol, such as drinking alcohol and smelling on the face, from the Inspector I belonging to the Ulsan Coast Guard, who was dispatched after receiving a report from the said F on the front of the said D Center, to the Defendant.

There was a reasonable reason to determine a person, and it was demanded to respond to the measurement of drinking by inserting the breath in three times between approximately 25 minutes.

Nevertheless, the Defendant avoided a drinking test and did not comply with a police officer’s request for a drinking test without justifiable grounds.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. The application of Acts and subordinate statutes to a report on the occurrence of a traffic accident, the field map of the traffic accident, the photographs related to the accident, the notification of the results of regulating the driving of alcohol, the circumstantial statement of the driver at home, and

1. Article 148-2 of the Road Traffic Act and Articles 148-2 and 44 (2) of the same Act concerning the facts constituting an offense, the selection of a fine, and the selection of a fine;

1. Article 70(1) and Article 69(2) of the Criminal Act to attract a workhouse;

1. 가납명령 형사 소송법 제 334조 제 1 항 양형의 이유 도로 교통법위반( 음주 측정거부) 죄의 죄질이 나쁠 뿐만 아니라, 피고인이 음주 측정 경찰관에게 욕설을 하고 도망가려는 모습을 보였던 점, 피고인에게 2001년도의 도로 교통법위반( 음주 운전) 죄, 특정범죄 가중처벌 등에 관한 법률위반( 도주차량) 죄, 도로 교통법 위반죄로 인한 1번의 징역형의 집행유예 전력과 2013년도의 도로 교통법위반( 음주 운전) 죄로 인한 1번의 벌금형 전력이 있는 점, 그 밖에 피고인에게 2000년도의 업무상 횡령죄로 인한 1번의 벌금형...

arrow