A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for six months.

However, the execution of the above sentence shall be suspended for a period of two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Punishment of the crime

The Defendant started the teaching system from the end of September 2015 to the end of July 31, 2016, and was living together with D on July 31, 2016 without reporting the marriage, and completed the marriage relationship around September 2016.

On November 2016, the Defendant drafted a false complaint against D with the intention of requesting D to obtain criminal punishment by requesting D from the law firm F, Seocho-gu Seoul, Seoul, to a lawyer C at a law firm F, which is located in Seocho-gu, Seoul E 701.

The complaint is that "D, the defendant of around November 2015, want to operate clothes in the form of G and Dong businesses" but it is necessary to pay KRW 120 million.

It is difficult to raise money because there is no help from the office to bear half of each person.

Around November 24, 2015, around November 24, 2015, the Defendant-Appellant transferred KRW 60 million to a corporate bank account under the name of the Defendant-Appellant, with a loan of KRW 60 million, and on July 2016, the Defendant-Appellant D, who was the first patrolman, will operate the clothes outside of his business.

In order to operate a store alone, G shall return the money 60 million won invested by G, and there is no way to prepare it.

Around July 18, 2016, the purport that “A loan of KRW 60 million is to be repaid with KRW 60 million prior to the loan,” and that “A loan of KRW 30 million to a corporate bank account in the name of G designated by the defendant against whom KRW 30 million was lent on July 19, 2016, and that “A loan of KRW 60,000,000 to a corporate bank account in the name of G designated by the defendant against whom KRW 60,000 was lent. The defendant shall not have the intention or ability to repay the loan at the time, and if the complainant did not have the intention to marry, access to the complainant and take over KRW 120,000,000,000 shall be punished.”

However, in fact, Defendant D did not borrow the above KRW 120 million as the Defendant, considering that it talks with the above purport.

Nevertheless, the defendant's name cannot be known to the public service offices of the former Gun Public Prosecutor's Office, which are located in the 70 military court through the around 14:00 military service on December 5, 2016.