The defendant's appeal is dismissed.

Expenses for appeal shall be borne by the defendant.

Purport of claim and appeal

[Claim]

1. The reasoning of the judgment of this court citing the judgment of the court of first instance is the same as that of the judgment of the court of first instance, except for dismissal or addition as follows. As such, the reasoning of this court citing the summary of Article 420 of the Civil Procedure Act as it is.

The margin between the purport and the reason of the claim was not considered to be one in calculating the number of parallels No. 2 and No. 13.

(hereinafter the same shall apply)

“The futures option account in the Defendant’s name” shall be formed with “the futures option account in the Defendant’s name (Account Number D, hereinafter “instant account”).”

The Minister of Education, Science and Technology No. 2, 15-16, “The Defendant shall pay the Plaintiff the money set forth in paragraph (1) of the order,” with “The Defendant shall pay the Plaintiff 286,398,851 won, and 270,890,265 won, 16% per annum from August 25, 2005 to May 2, 2006, and 20% per annum from the next day to the date of full payment.”

In the case of 2nd 19 to 20th scam, the scam can be recognized, and the scam can be recognized (hereinafter referred to as the scambling litigation in the case of the first to the third scam).

(i)be engaged in Sycholar;

The Plaintiff’s claim against the Defendant of this case is accepted on the grounds that the Plaintiff has a duty to pay the money set forth in Paragraph (1) of the Order Nos. 3 to 2-3. The Plaintiff is obligated to pay “286,398,851 won and 270,890,265 won per annum from August 25, 2005 to May 2, 2006, and 20% per annum from the next day to the day of full payment,” which is the amount ordered by the first instance judgment of the first instance court to pay the money. The Defendant is obligated to pay to the Plaintiff the money calculated at a rate of 16% per annum from August 25, 2005 to the day of full payment. On January 2005, the Defendant demanded the Plaintiff to close the gift option account opened by the Defendant (the number E was all closed, and the Plaintiff did not close the account.