The defendant's appeal is dismissed.

The main point of the defendant's appeal is that the sentence of imprisonment with prison labor (one year and six months and fine of twenty million won) against the defendant is too unreasonable.

Therefore, considering the favorable circumstances of the Defendant, such as: (a) the confession of each of the instant crimes; (b) the Defendant’s confession of each of the instant crimes; (c) the Defendant did not have any criminal record other than fines; (d) the period of the instant crimes in violation of the Act on Special Measures for the Control of Public Health Crimes (non-pharmaceuticals, etc.); (c) a relatively short-term period of two months; and (d) the total retail price of counterfeit lag, etc. sold or acquired for sale is not a relatively large amount of 11,352,50 won; (d) the Defendant’s father’s expenses for urology treatment; and (e) the Defendant is obliged to support her father’s urine and her wife who suffered pictures; and (e) a violation of the Act on Special Measures for the Control of Public Health Crimes (non-pharmaceuticals, etc.) takes into account the fact that the Defendant sold drugs that may cause fatal side effects, such as flaging and hearing ability, and that the Defendant’s act of purchasing and taking advantage of personal information from each of the Defendant’s key sentencing will play the sentencing.

If so, the defendant's appeal is without merit, Article 364 (4) of the Criminal Procedure Act.