Text
The prosecutor's appeal is dismissed.
Reasons
1. The gist of the grounds for appeal is as follows: (a) the entire written confirmation of the instant facts is written in the entirety of the written confirmation of the grounds for appeal; and (b) the content is not an important matter to waive the authority or to bear a specific obligation; and (c) even if the signature and seal of the nominal owner E is not affixed, it is sufficient for the general public
Therefore, it is recognized that the charge of forging the private document of this case and exercising the above investigation document is guilty.
2. Based on the circumstances stated in its reasoning, the lower court determined that the instant factual confirmation was of sufficient appearance and form to mislead the private document prepared by E by the nominal owner, on the grounds of the circumstances indicated in its reasoning.
It is difficult to recognize the defendant as not guilty.
In addition, the reasoning of the lower judgment’s acquittal and the evidence of this case closely examined. The instant factual confirmation document was submitted as evidence in the lawsuit between the Defendant and E, and its content can be directly determined, but there is no signature seal affixed by the nominal E, and the E’s seal imprint certificate written as attachment is difficult to be deemed as a genuine private document prepared by E, in light of the form, appearance, preparation process, contents, etc. of the instant factual confirmation document, the evidence submitted by the prosecutor alone is insufficient to acknowledge that the instant factual confirmation document is sufficient for the general public to write it into the genuine private document written by the nominal owner, and there is no other evidence to acknowledge it.
Therefore, the judgment of the court below is just, and the prosecutor's assertion is without merit.
3. In conclusion, the prosecutor's appeal is dismissed in accordance with Article 364 (4) of the Criminal Procedure Act on the grounds that the appeal is without merit. It is so decided as per Disposition.