1. The plaintiff's appeal is dismissed.

2. The costs of appeal shall be borne by the Plaintiff.

The purport of the claim and appeal is the purport of the appeal.

1. The reasoning of this court’s judgment citing the judgment of the court of first instance is the same as that of the judgment of the court of first instance, and thus, it is acceptable in accordance with the main sentence of Article 420 of the Civil Procedure Act.

2. The Plaintiff asserts that the Plaintiff is the owner of the instant land in light of the fact that the former land register (No. 4-2) and the land substitution plan (No. 4-3) are written by the Plaintiff as the owner of the instant land, which is a document related to the land substitution of the land unit, such as Gyeonggi-gun I, G, and I.

However, in full view of the purport of Eul evidence Nos. 4-1, 2, and 3 as well as the overall purport of the arguments, it can be recognized that the land of this case has already been replaced with 1,518 square meters prior to J of Inju-gun, and thus, the plaintiff's above assertion cannot be accepted.

3. In conclusion, the plaintiff's claim of this case shall be dismissed as it is without merit. Since the judgment of the court of first instance is just in conclusion, the plaintiff's appeal is dismissed as it is without merit. It is so decided as per Disposition.