1. The defendant's appeal is dismissed.

2. The costs of appeal shall be borne by the Defendant.

Purport of claim and appeal

O's purport.

1. (1) On March 28, 1930, Nonparty AB completed the registration of preservation of ownership as to the forest land Nos. 2, 3, 2, 3, and 8, 2, 3, 3, 1995 (hereinafter “D”).

(2) Since then, the said D Forest was divided into F2 1 to G1 to G1 to G2, and H residing in the J of J of J (However, “J” in AC) on January 8, 1932, purchased the said F and G forest from AB on January 11, 1932, and completed the registration of ownership transfer on each of the above land on January 11, 1932.

(C) On March 31, 195, the said G forest was registered as “1,418 square meters prior to I” on March 31, 1955, and the owner under the Forestry Register (Evidence A5) was written as H residing in J.

(4) On November 25, 1979 and April 9, 1981, “B 1,584 square meters” was included in the land substitution plan (Evidence 6). The owner’s column for the land substitution plan (Evidence 6) was written as “AD” (AD) residing in the “J”, and the owner’s column for the land cadastre was written as “AE (E) residing in the “J” (AE) (No. 7) or “J” and written as “K (K) residing in the “J” (Evidence 10) or “J” (No. 9).

(5) On October 17, 1990, L, M, and N land was divided into land B (the above B answer remains 1,518 square meters, and the land substitution was made. The owner’s column of the land substitution plan (Evidence A8) was written as K (K) where the owner resides in “Man-gun ACri”.

(6) However, on January 15, 2016, the Defendant has the Gu as to B 1,518 square meters (hereinafter “instant land”) after the said subdivision.