beta
Text
Defendant
A Imprisonment with prison labor for two years, for one year, for one year, for three months, for each of six months.
Defendant .
Reasons
Punishment of the crime
Since the portion of the facts charged of the 2016 Highest 5652, which is judged not guilty as follows, the charges were amended to specify only the portion which is found guilty except for this.
1. The Defendants’ relevant Defendants’ employees serve as the staff of the law office from the Army Noncommissioned Officers’ origin. Defendant B, who was a person from the Army Noncommissioned Officer’s origin and worked as a former insurance designer, was known to the Plaintiff at the Institute of Sports Admission (hereinafter referred to as the Defendant A). Defendant N, who was at the Army Captain’s origin, was known to, and known to, Defendant A from July 2013, who was an in-service insurance designer, was an in-service private person, and was known to, Defendant A from July 2013. Defendant A was released from the Army Noncommissioned Officer’s Republic of Korea, and Defendant C was friendly with Defendant A. Defendant C, and Defendant D was friendly with Defendant A.
2. Defendant A’s sole criminal defendant received a long-term hospitalized treatment for the purpose of receiving insurance money, such as hospitalization expenses and hospitalization allowances, more than necessary for the purpose of receiving the insurance money, and received the insurance money under the name of hospitalization expenses. Although it is not entirely necessary for hospitalization, Defendant A received the insurance money under the name of hospitalization expenses by pretending to be hospitalized at a hospital that is easy to
Accordingly, around January 13, 2014, the Defendant was subject to a traffic accident at the outer expressway of Gyeyang-gu Incheon Metropolitan City on June 17, 2013 on the Victim Postal Insurance (Masan Business Headquarters) around January 13, 2014, and was diagnosed by the injury, such as “infections and tensions,” etc. at P hospital from June 22, 2013.
7. That he was hospitalized for 13 days until April.
A claim for insurance in the name of hospitalization was made.
However, the defendant's treatment does not require long-term hospitalization as above, and the defendant continues to repeat going out and going out while being hospitalized and repeatedly prescribes only preserved treatment.