logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 대전지방법원 2013.12.27 2013노2372
성폭력범죄의처벌등에관한특례법위반(카메라등이용촬영)등
Text

Defendant

All appeals by prosecutors are dismissed.

Reasons

1. Summary of grounds for appeal (unfair sentencing)

A. In light of all the circumstances, including the fact that the defendant is against the defendant, the punishment imposed by the court below (two months of imprisonment, confiscation) is too unreasonable.

B. In light of all the circumstances, such as the fact that the prosecutor’s defendant was under the suspension of execution without being aware of the fact that he was going to commit the instant crime, the punishment sentenced by the lower court (old imprisonment: one year and six months, and confiscation) is too uneasible and unreasonable.

2. The judgment of the defendant is recognized that all of the crimes of this case were committed, against whom the defendant was committed, and all of the victims and the victims were smoothly agreed to during the trial, and the victims did not want the punishment of the defendant, and that the defendant has no record of being punished for sexual crimes until now.

However, the crime of this case was committed on the second floor of the building with a view to stealing women's melting the burine, and it was taken twice through the window of the building using smartphone cameras, and it is highly likely that the defendant who seems to have a normal decentralization has committed a crime plannedly impreciably for his own sexual satisfaction, it is highly likely that the defendant committed a crime that is protected and protected, and it is in violation of the law, and it is not good that the defendant committed the crime of this case without care, even though he was under the suspension of execution due to the crime of special larceny, and the defendant was in the crime of this case without care, and around January 27, 2013, after being aware of the crime by the victim C of the crime, he was set off in another place, and the defendant was found to have not been able to escape, and the defendant committed the crime of this case, such as the use of a structure after being investigated by the police, and there is no sufficient reason to use the toilet.

arrow