1. The plaintiff's claim is dismissed.

2. The costs of lawsuit shall be borne by the Plaintiff.

Details of the disposition

On February 1, 2008, the Plaintiff’s husband B (hereinafter “the Deceased”) joined C Co., Ltd. (hereinafter “the instant company”) as the head of the headquarters and served as the deceased.

On July 6, 2013, when the Deceased worked at the instant company, he/she arrived at the D Hospital at around 16:00 and returned to the dormitory of the Deceased at around 23:00, when he/she was living at around 15:0 and returned to the hospital of the Deceased at around 18:30, he/she received treatment at around 23:57, on July 7, 2013, after he/she went to the emergency room of the Seoyang University Hospital at around 158, Seoyang University Hospital at around 23:57.

In the death diagnosis report on the deceased, the direct death person is indicated as the symptoms of acute officers and livers, the causes of direct death, and the causes of livering, and the causes of livering, as the hepatitis B.

On April 10, 2014, the Plaintiff claimed for the payment of survivors’ benefits and funeral expenses to the Defendant, asserting that the causal relationship between the deceased’s death and the work was recognized. However, on the ground that “the deceased diagnosed hepatitis B in 2004 and received treatment by liveration since 2007, the deceased was sick due to liver infection, and the ethic ethic ethic ethic ethic ethic ethic ethic ethic ethic ethic ethic ethic ethic ethic ethic ethic ethic e

(hereinafter “instant disposition”). The Plaintiff dissatisfied with the instant disposition and filed a request for an examination with the Defendant Headquarters, but the said request was dismissed on September 18, 2014, and the Plaintiff filed a request for reexamination with the Industrial Accident Compensation Insurance Review Committee on the grounds of objection to the said decision, but the said request was dismissed on February 10, 2015.

[Ground of recognition] Unsatisfy, Gap evidence Nos. 1 and 2, Eul evidence Nos. 1, and the purport of the entire pleading is legitimate. The plaintiff's assertion is legitimate.