logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 광주지방법원해남지원 2019.07.10 2018가합3469
기타(금전)
Text

1. All of the plaintiff's claims are dismissed.

2. The costs of lawsuit shall be borne by the Plaintiff.

Reasons

1. Basic facts

A. The plaintiff is the birth of the defendant's wife C, and is the birth of the plaintiff, the defendant, the wife and the defendant.

B. From February 2012 to July 201 of the same year, the Plaintiff signed a contract on the exercise of fishery rights with the said fishing village fraternity (hereinafter “D fishing village fraternity”) around that time.

C. From February 201 to July 201 of the same year, the Plaintiff managed 620 canal Dual Dual 620 canal Dual Dual Dual Dual Dual Dual 120 canal Dual Dual Dual Dual Dual Dual 120 canal Dual Dual Dual Dual Dual Dual Dual 120 was additionally installed around September 2016. At this point, the Plaintiff entered 250,000 Dual Dual Duals

(2) The Plaintiff managed the entire culture hall of this case by August 2, 2017.

[Ground of recognition] Facts without dispute, Gap evidence Nos. 1, 2, 3, 10 through 14, 17 (including each number; hereinafter the same shall apply), the purport of the whole pleadings

2. Determination as to the cause of action

A. Around February 2012, the Plaintiff and the Defendant concluded a business agreement with the content that “The Defendant included the Plaintiff’s share in the entire uniform 120 square meters each year in the entire uniform 30,000 square meters, and the Plaintiff forms the Defendant’s 250,000 square meters in the entire uniform 500 square meters, but the profits accrued from the entire uniform 30 square meters are distributed according to the ratio of the sold uniform.”

(B) After January 2015, the Defendant agreed to pay KRW 70 million annually to the Plaintiff, and the Plaintiff paid KRW 324,381,600, out of the money received from the Defendant, C, and the customer, paid to the Defendant and C from January 13, 2014 to January 10, 2017, re-investment in the business of the former culture of the instant case in the manner of paying KRW 324,381,60, out of the money received from the Defendant, C, and the customer, or used it as costs related to the operation of the former culture of the instant case.

Furthermore, the Plaintiff.

arrow