logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울중앙지방법원 2017.02.15 2016고단9124
상해
Text

Defendant

A A shall be punished by a fine of two million won, and Defendant B shall be punished by a fine of four million won.

The above fine is imposed against the Defendants.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

1. On August 6, 2016, at the main point of “E” located in Jung-gu Seoul, Seoul, around 02:15 on August 6, 2016, the Defendant: (a) had a dispute with the victim B (33 years) who is an employee; (b) had the Defendant’s conduct with another place; and (c) had the Defendant’s conduct with another place; and (d) found the Defendant’s back-to-date store; (b) had the Defendant’s conduct with the Defendant, the Defendant carried the Defendant’s conduct to the other place; and (c) had the victim flick

“Along with the victim’s left side, the victim’s knife and her grandchildren led the victim to 2-3 times, and the victim exceeded the victim, thereby having the victim go beyond approximately two weeks of treatment. As such, the victim was galivists and gamblings around the snow, etc. in need of approximately two weeks of treatment.

2. Defendant B, at the time, at the time, at the place specified in the above paragraph (1) above, suffered the above injury from the victim A (38 tax) who was moving the disturbance from the victim at the main point of view, as seen above, the victim A (38 tax) suffered from the above injury. B) Defendant B, by assaulting the victim, such as assaulting the victim’s face at a time, taking the victim’s face from drinking, taking the victim’s face at a time, and taking the victim’s face from drinking, thereby causing injury to the victim around the bottom left-hand side that

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendants’ respective legal statements

1. The protocol concerning the interrogation of each police suspect against the Defendants

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes of each injury diagnosis letter;

1. Relevant Article 257(1) of the Criminal Act and the choice of a fine for criminal facts (the Defendants)

1. Articles 70(1) and 69(2) of the Criminal Act on the confinement of the workhouse (defendants)

1. The grounds for sentencing under Article 334(1) of the Criminal Procedure Act recognize and reflects the Defendants’ crime, the degree of injury of the victim A is not less severe, the Defendant B caused the instant crime due to the escape of the victim A under the influence of alcohol, the criminal records of the same kind of fine to the Defendant A, the Defendant B had no record of criminal punishment, and the Defendant B made efforts to recover damage by depositing certain money to the victim A, etc. In addition, the Defendants’ age, sex behavior, family relationship, family environment, and the motive and consequence of the instant crime.

arrow