A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for a term of one year and four months.

However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for a period of two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Punishment of the crime

On April 10, 2009, the Defendant issued a summary order of KRW 1.5 million for a crime of violating the Road Traffic Act (drinking driving) at the Daejeon District Court.

Criminal facts

1. The Defendant is a person who is engaged in driving a motor vehicle with lurburged B, in violation of the Act on the Aggravated Punishment, etc. of Specific Crimes.

On July 23, 2020, the Defendant driven the said car under the influence of alcohol content of 0.143% in blood around 03:40 on July 23, 2020, and led to the flow of the said car at a low distance of galm in the Seo-gu, Seo-gu, Seo-gu, Daejeon at a four-lane away from the four-lane away away from the galke-gu, Seo-gu.

At the time of night, the front door was set at the night, and there was a signal at the front door, and thus, the driver of the motor vehicle had a duty of care to take care of the front door and the left door, and to prevent the accident in advance by accurately operating the steering gear and the brakes and to prevent the accident by driving the motor vehicle safely in accordance with the signals.

Nevertheless, the Defendant, while under the influence of alcohol, was negligent in driving, and the Defendant was able to drive the victim C(24 years old) who was waiting in the atmosphere in accordance with the vehicle stop signals at the front direction of the Defendant’s proceeding.

Ultimately, the Defendant driven the said car in a situation where normal driving is difficult due to the influence of drinking, and suffered injury to the victim, such as brain-dead, which does not have any wound within two weeks of open medical treatment.

2. On the day specified in paragraph 1, the Defendant was driving a BA-pured vehicle with alcohol content of about 0.143% at the 1km section from the front of a mutually influent restaurant in the Daejeon Seo-gu hot spring dong to the place of accident described in paragraph 1.

Accordingly, the Defendant violated the prohibition of drinking alcohol driving regulations not less than twice.

Summary of Evidence

1. Regarding the defendant's legal statement E, C, and F