logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 광주지방법원 순천지원 2020.07.29 2017고단1688
사기
Text

The prosecution of this case is dismissed.

An application for remedy by an applicant for remedy shall be dismissed.

Reasons

1. The summary of the facts charged reveals that the Defendant, with the knowledge of the fact that he/she is entitled to receive insurance money, such as a daily hospitalization, when he/she purchased an insurance policy and was hospitalized at a hospital, he/she purchased an insurance policy with a high coverage for the purpose of receiving insurance money, and received the documents necessary for receiving the insurance money, such as a certificate of hospitalization and a medical certificate, stating as if he/she had received proper hospitalized treatment from the relevant hospital, and submitted them to the insurance company. On December 9, 2008, the Defendant subscribed to the “D insurance” of the victim C insurance company, “F insurance” of the victim E insurance company, “D insurance” of the victim E insurance company, and “I insurance” of the victim H insurance company. On June 29, 2009, the victim’s “J insurance” and “Health Insurance” of the victim post office on August 19, 200, “Health Insurance Act” of the victim post office, “Health Insurance Company” of the victim on November 19, 2010.

After entering into an insurance contract as above, on January 8, 2010, the Defendant was hospitalized for 14 days by asking for salt, tension, etc. from the paryary clinic located O in Gyang-si.

However, in fact, the defendant was hospitalized in the hospital with the intention to obtain insurance money from the insurance company as the daily allowances for hospitalization, and was not in a situation where it was difficult to move to the hospital for a long time, and there was no need for hospitalized treatment, such as going to the outside during the period of hospitalization, and it was possible to give sufficient treatment due to outpatient treatments.

Nevertheless, around January 25, 2010, the Defendant claimed insurance money for the above hospitalization medical treatment to the victim Q2 Co., Ltd. as an insured event, and such insurance money was transferred from the victim’s employees to the post office account in the name of the Defendant on January 27, 2010, under the name of the Defendant, 50,000 won.

arrow