The defendant's appeal is dismissed.

1. The summary of the grounds for appeal is too unreasonable because of the sentence imposed by the court below on the defendant (six months of imprisonment).

2. There is no circumstance to consider the Defendant as favorable to the Defendant, such as the fact that the Defendant fully recognized each of the instant crimes, and the damage caused by each of the instant crimes is relatively minor.

However, in consideration of the following: (a) the Defendant, without being subject to criminal punishment on several occasions for the same kind of crime; (b) completed the sentence for the same type of crime, and completed the sentence on three (3) days after having been sentenced to criminal punishment; (c) the Defendant began to commit each of the instant crimes; and (d) the damage from each of the instant crimes was not recovered; and (c) the various sentencing conditions indicated in the records and theories, such as the Defendant’s age, sex, environment, circumstances of each of the instant crimes, and the circumstances before and after the instant crimes, are equally considered, and thus, it is not unreasonable for the lower court to have imposed the Defendant too much punishment on the Defendant, and thus, the above assertion by

3. In conclusion, the defendant's appeal is dismissed in accordance with Article 364 (4) of the Criminal Procedure Act on the grounds that the defendant's appeal is without merit. It is so decided as per Disposition.