1. Revocation of a judgment of the first instance;

2. The plaintiff's claim is dismissed.

3. All costs of the lawsuit shall be borne by the Plaintiff.

1. On December 9, 2015, the Plaintiff and the Defendant concluded a construction contract that replaces the sewerage pipeline pipes, the pipe pipes, and the toilet variable floor strawing date (3.7 million won for construction cost) at the Government-si, the Plaintiff’s building, and the Defendant concluded a construction contract (3.7 million won for construction cost).

(2) The Defendant is obligated to pay the Plaintiff KRW 5 million as compensation for damages in lieu of defective repair, on the ground that the pipes leading to the outside are not replaced, due to the defect that is irrelevant to the Plaintiff’s assertion, even though a contract was entered into with a total amount of KRW 13 million. However, the Defendant is obligated to pay the Plaintiff KRW 5 million as compensation for damages in lieu of defective repair.

2. The judgment was examined, and the evidence alone submitted by the Plaintiff was that the Defendant failed to perform the construction work in accordance with the instant construction contract.

or there was a defect in the construction of this case

It is insufficient to regard sewage stations, etc. generated by the above 101 as due to the defects arising from the instant construction works, and there is no other evidence to acknowledge them.

Therefore, the plaintiff's assertion is without merit.

3. As such, the plaintiff's claim is dismissed due to the lack of reason, and the judgment of the court of first instance is unfair with different conclusions, and thus the plaintiff's claim is dismissed.