The judgment of the court below is reversed.

Defendant shall be punished by a fine of KRW 2,000,000.

The above fine shall not be paid by the defendant.

. We point out that “unconstruction was not carried out.” As the result of the review, we replaced the water supply pipe without replacing the water supply pipes with the water supply supplied to the household sanitation body, such as sprink, sprink, and shower without replacing the water supply pipes. In mixing with the water supply supplied to this household, melting melting the water supply control unit, and replacing the water supply pipe without replacing the water supply pipe.

I point out that the occurrence of green products does not exist.”

③ While the primary and secondary water supply pipes were not included in the replacement of hot water supply pipes in the primary and secondary water supply pipes, and the term “water supply” was mentioned in the secondary water supply pipes in the secondary water supply pipes, the construction of hot water supply pipes is not related to drinking and underground water supply pipes.

④ The first contract for the construction of the instant apartment water supply pipe is stipulated as “connection of water supplied for hot water and heating supply water” and “excluding water supplied for hot water and heating pipes, awarded water pipelines, utility tunnel pipes, and outdoor pipes”.

⑤ On July 30, 2014, the 10th occupants’ representative meeting of the instant apartment complex was convened by the construction company upon completion, and the 10th occupants’ representative meeting of the instant apartment complex was convened. However, the management director presented an agenda to the effect that “the 10th occupants’ meeting of the instant apartment complex supplied water tank to proceed with construction works replacing the water supply tank with the content from the existing white tube,” and the Defendant present an opinion to require the explanation of the water supply tank connection works and to review the need.

Although this special meeting is proceeding with discussions and the members use the expression "water supply tank" instead of the expression "water supply tank", it has been discussed about the contents of the project and whether it is necessary to replace or replace the contents of the project.

In September 18, 2014, the 10th Council of Representatives of Residents, the apartment of this case, which was held on September 18, 2014.