The prosecution of this case is dismissed.

1. The Defendant is a person who operates a restaurant.

On 21:55 on 30. 30. 30. 30. 21:21. 21. 55, the owner of the Hop House entered the head of the Nowon-gu Seoul Special Metropolitan City, Nowon-gu, and the first floor “D” house, and the owner of the Hop House, “Ie the same withdrawal of alcohol, and Ieve, Ie the owner of the Hop House,” called “Ieve, I am mee and meeve,” and am a plaque.

The victim E (the 40 years of age, the remaining) who had been a guest in the above head of the above head of the family, was assaulted on the part of the victim, on the ground that the victim said that the victim said that the victim “at her only and at home” was “at her time”.

2. The facts charged in the instant case are crimes falling under Article 260(1) of the Criminal Act, and cannot be prosecuted against the victim’s express intent under Article 260(3) of the Criminal Act.

Accordingly, according to the agreement submitted to this court on November 6, 2018, it is evident that the victim expressed his/her wish not to punish the defendant. Thus, the prosecution of this case is dismissed pursuant to Article 327 subparagraph 6 of the Criminal Procedure Act.