1. As to the Plaintiff B’s KRW 9,668,60, Plaintiff A, C, D, and E respectively, and each of the said money on September 27, 2014.

1. Facts of recognition;

A. From around 2005, the Ministry of Environment had a local government operate a damage prevention team for harvest season in order to capture harmful wild animals that are likely to cause damage to crops in accordance with Article 23(5) of the Wildlife Protection and Management Act (hereinafter “ Wildlife Act”), and around August 2014, the Defendant organized a damage prevention team for harvest season upon recommendation from the Federation of High Military Wild Hun-gun Animals to capture harmful wild animals, and permitted its affiliated FF, etc. to capture harmful wild animals from the High Military Hun-Gun Hun-Ga.

B. Around 06:55 on September 27, 2014, F searched for the purpose of catching harmful wild animals with a shot gun located in Masung-gun G. The place where the search was conducted is not far away from the authorization. At least two persons for each released area are engaged in catching and gathering harmful wild animals. At the time of discovering and launching harmful wild animals, F was required to first check the risk and the subject of catching and to prevent accidents in advance, and was negligent in launching the guns at a distance of about 10 meters during the mixed search, and was found to have shot gun that was in possession of the shot gun without a proper verification, and was sentenced to a 10-month shock during the 20-month grace period, and was sentenced to a 15-month shock during the 10-month period, and was sentenced to a 10-month shock by occupational negligence on the part of H on the part of the 20-round 10-round 20-round 2017.

C. The Plaintiffs were children of H, and Plaintiff B, South Korea, spent the funeral expenses of H. The F is the occupational negligence crime of occupational negligence, i.e., Changwon District Court 2014Kadan1203.