1. The plaintiff's appeal is dismissed.

2. The costs of appeal shall be borne by the Plaintiff.

The purport of the claim and appeal is the purport of the appeal.

1. The reasons for the acceptance of the judgment of the court of first instance are the same as the reasons for the judgment of the court of first instance, except for the addition of the following, and thus, it is acceptable as it is in accordance with Article 420

2. Following the 5th page “The 2nd page of the instant written agreement” added “The following circumstances that may be known by taking full account of the overall purport of the pleadings at the witness A and G’s testimony as well as the entire purport of the pleadings”.

The following shall be added to the 6th page:

① The instant agreement was written by G and Defendant C, and Defendant D did not sit in the same place.

There is no signature or seal on the side of the defendant D's name, which was flive under the instant agreement, and otherwise, the defendant D participated in the preparation of the instant agreement.

There is no particular circumstance to deem that A agreed to pay KRW 100 million to A.

In this respect, it is difficult to accept the claim against Defendant D.

(2) There seems to have been a significant benefit to A, such as allowing A, to whom the operating funds of a hospital were insufficient, to escape from such financial situation at once, with the effect of credit three months.

③ The Plaintiff asserted that the Defendants purchased drugs related to beauty art through the Plaintiff on the grounds that they were unable to live, but the Defendants were able to kill drugs related to beauty art without going through the Plaintiff, and the Plaintiff did not assert and prove specific circumstances, such as how the specific items cannot be slaughtered for any reason.

④ In the rehabilitation case of Seoul Central District Court 2015 Ma100209, A, as a custodian, entered the claims of the Defendants (F) in KRW 20,110,755 on October 15, 2015, and registered the overall list with the claims of the Defendants (F) as rehabilitation creditors. On December 7, 2015, a custodian’s report (Evidence B No. 4) prepared and reported the claims of the Defendants (F) in KRW 20,110,755.

5. The witness G of the political party is referring to the circumstances of the Defendant, i.e., young people (defendants).